This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    drm/i915: fix user irq miss in BSD ring on g4x

to the 2.6.38-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     drm-i915-fix-user-irq-miss-in-bsd-ring-on-g4x.patch
and it can be found in the queue-2.6.38 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.


>From 5bfa1063a775836a84f97e4df863fc36e1f856ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Feng, Boqun" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 16:02:39 +0800
Subject: drm/i915: fix user irq miss in BSD ring on g4x

From: "Feng, Boqun" <[email protected]>

commit 5bfa1063a775836a84f97e4df863fc36e1f856ad upstream.

On g4x, user interrupt in BSD ring is missed.
This is because though g4x and ironlake share the same bsd_ring,
their interrupt control interfaces have _two_ differences.

1.different irq enable/disable functions:
On g4x are i915_enable_irq and i915_disable_irq.
On ironlake are ironlake_enable_irq and ironlake_disable_irq.
2.different irq flag:
On g4x user interrupt flag in BSD ring on is I915_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT.
On ironlake is GT_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT

Old bsd_ring_get/put_irq call ring_get_irq and ring_get_irq.
ring_get_irq and ring_put_irq only call ironlake_enable/disable_irq.
So comes the irq miss on g4x.

To fix this, as other rings' code do, conditionally call different
functions(i915_enable/disable_irq and ironlake_enable/disable_irq)
and use different interrupt flags in bsd_ring_get/put_irq.

Signed-off-by: Feng, Boqun <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Xiang, Haihao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -684,12 +684,37 @@ gen6_ring_put_irq(struct intel_ring_buff
 static bool
 bsd_ring_get_irq(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
 {
-       return ring_get_irq(ring, GT_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT);
+       struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev;
+       drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+
+       if (!dev->irq_enabled)
+               return false;
+
+       spin_lock(&ring->irq_lock);
+       if (ring->irq_refcount++ == 0) {
+               if (IS_G4X(dev))
+                       i915_enable_irq(dev_priv, I915_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT);
+               else
+                       ironlake_enable_irq(dev_priv, GT_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT);
+       }
+       spin_unlock(&ring->irq_lock);
+
+       return true;
 }
 static void
 bsd_ring_put_irq(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
 {
-       ring_put_irq(ring, GT_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT);
+       struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev;
+       drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+
+       spin_lock(&ring->irq_lock);
+       if (--ring->irq_refcount == 0) {
+               if (IS_G4X(dev))
+                       i915_disable_irq(dev_priv, I915_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT);
+               else
+                       ironlake_disable_irq(dev_priv, GT_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT);
+       }
+       spin_unlock(&ring->irq_lock);
 }
 
 static int


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to