* Brown, Len <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alan convinced me that the community doesn't move that fast, and
> that we should wallow in the swill for a while longer before
> deleting. [...]
Yeah, it's much nicer this way.
> [...] Others volunteered to test the latest upstream kernel on APM
> hardware, giving APM's presence in the upstream kernel a life line.
> So all I did was add the recommended feature-removal's and warnings
> for the stuff which obviously should go. But if you see some of
> your favorite bits on the chopping block, you have at least 6
> months to make a case for them :-)
:-)
I only saw one of the runtime warnings on one of my testboxes - i
adjusted the boot parameter setting (the parameter was bogus) and
moved on. So life can go on as far as i'm involved :-)
Thanks,
Ingo
_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
