2.6.39-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
 system dma mask

From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

commit 8fcc5372fbac085199d84a880503ed67aba3fe49 upstream.

The identity mapping code appears to make the assumption that if the
devices dma_mask is greater than 32bits the device can use identity
mapping.  But that is not true: take the case where we have a 40bit
device in a 44bit architecture. The device can potentially receive a
physical address that it will truncate and cause incorrect addresses
to be used.

Instead check to see if the device's dma_mask is large enough
to address the system's dma_mask.

Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mike Habeck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c |   15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
@@ -2190,8 +2190,19 @@ static int iommu_should_identity_map(str
         * Assume that they will -- if they turn out not to be, then we can 
         * take them out of the 1:1 domain later.
         */
-       if (!startup)
-               return pdev->dma_mask > DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
+       if (!startup) {
+               /*
+                * If the device's dma_mask is less than the system's memory
+                * size then this is not a candidate for identity mapping.
+                */
+               u64 dma_mask = pdev->dma_mask;
+
+               if (pdev->dev.coherent_dma_mask &&
+                   pdev->dev.coherent_dma_mask < dma_mask)
+                       dma_mask = pdev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
+
+               return dma_mask >= dma_get_required_mask(&pdev->dev);
+       }
 
        return 1;
 }


_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to