2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[email protected]>

commit bf1f0a05d472e33dda8e5e69525be1584cdbd03a upstream.

on 9g20 they are the same as the 9260

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
@@ -1687,7 +1687,7 @@ static int __init at91udc_probe(struct p
        }
 
        /* newer chips have more FIFO memory than rm9200 */
-       if (cpu_is_at91sam9260()) {
+       if (cpu_is_at91sam9260() || cpu_is_at91sam9g20()) {
                udc->ep[0].maxpacket = 64;
                udc->ep[3].maxpacket = 64;
                udc->ep[4].maxpacket = 512;


_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to