2.6.39-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------


From: =?UTF-8?q?Micha=C5=82=20Miros=C5=82aw?= <mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl>

[ Upstream commit fd0daf9d58f6b3342d07c5f6bbfb304dbe5db4ec ]

Current code squashes flags to bool - this makes set_flags fail whenever
some ETH_FLAG_* equivalent features are set. Fix this.

Signed-off-by: Micha©© Miros©©aw <mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@suse.de>
---
 net/core/ethtool.c |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/core/ethtool.c
+++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
@@ -231,6 +231,29 @@ static int ethtool_set_feature_compat(st
        return 1;
 }
 
+static int ethtool_set_flags_compat(struct net_device *dev,
+       int (*legacy_set)(struct net_device *, u32),
+       struct ethtool_set_features_block *features, u32 mask)
+{
+       u32 value;
+
+       if (!legacy_set)
+               return 0;
+
+       if (!(features[0].valid & mask))
+               return 0;
+
+       value = dev->features & ~features[0].valid;
+       value |= features[0].requested;
+
+       features[0].valid &= ~mask;
+
+       if (legacy_set(dev, value & mask) < 0)
+               netdev_info(dev, "Legacy flags change failed\n");
+
+       return 1;
+}
+
 static int ethtool_set_features_compat(struct net_device *dev,
        struct ethtool_set_features_block *features)
 {
@@ -247,7 +270,7 @@ static int ethtool_set_features_compat(s
                features, NETIF_F_ALL_TSO);
        compat |= ethtool_set_feature_compat(dev, dev->ethtool_ops->set_rx_csum,
                features, NETIF_F_RXCSUM);
-       compat |= ethtool_set_feature_compat(dev, dev->ethtool_ops->set_flags,
+       compat |= ethtool_set_flags_compat(dev, dev->ethtool_ops->set_flags,
                features, flags_dup_features);
 
        return compat;


_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
stable@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to