On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:12:50 -0000
> Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > The code checks the correctness of the parameters, but unconditionally
> > arms/disarms the hrtimer.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: sta...@kernel.org
> 
> The -stable maintainers will want to know why they should merge this.
> 
> The maintainers of other trees will wonder whether they should backport
> it too.
> 
> To help them make these decision we should always provide a description
> of the user-visible effects of the bug, please.

Fair enough. 

The result is that a random task might arm/disarm rtc timer and
surprise the real owner by either generating events or by stopping
them. Both undesired behaviour :)

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
stable@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to