2.6.35-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua...@intel.com>

commit 3181faa85bda3dc3f5e630a1846526c9caaa38e3 upstream.

I got a rcu warnning at boot. the ioc->ioc_data is rcu_deferenced, but
doesn't hold rcu_read_lock.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jax...@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>

---
 block/cfq-iosched.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6.35.y/block/cfq-iosched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.35.y.orig/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ linux-2.6.35.y/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -2615,11 +2615,14 @@ static void __cfq_exit_single_io_context
        smp_wmb();
        cic->key = cfqd_dead_key(cfqd);
 
+       rcu_read_lock();
        if (rcu_dereference(ioc->ioc_data) == cic) {
+               rcu_read_unlock();
                spin_lock(&ioc->lock);
                rcu_assign_pointer(ioc->ioc_data, NULL);
                spin_unlock(&ioc->lock);
-       }
+       } else
+               rcu_read_unlock();
 
        if (cic->cfqq[BLK_RW_ASYNC]) {
                cfq_exit_cfqq(cfqd, cic->cfqq[BLK_RW_ASYNC]);

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
stable@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to