On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 03:14:16PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:05:41 -0700
> Greg KH <gre...@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:58:35AM -0700, gre...@suse.de wrote:
> > > 
> > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> > > 
> > >     cifs: lower default and max wsize to what 2.6.39 can handle
> > > 
> > > to the 2.6.39-stable tree which can be found at:
> > >     
> > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
> > > 
> > > The filename of the patch is:
> > >      cifs-lower-default-and-max-wsize-to-what-2.6.39-can-handle.patch
> > > and it can be found in the queue-2.6.39 subdirectory.
> > > 
> > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> > > please let <sta...@kernel.org> know about it.
> > 
> > Reverted as the previous patch it depended on caused a build breakage.
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Yes, that one would cause build breakage. My apologies for initially
> sending that one, but I thought that I had followed up that patch with
> a respin that should fix the build breakage.
> 
> Here it is again, in case it didn't go through for some reason:

Hm, that fixed the breakage caused by the previous patch, but ideally we
should never have a patch in the tree that causes a build failure.

So I fixed the previous patch by hand, then applied this one (without
the duplicate chunk), so all should be good.  But please verify that I
got it all merged properly.

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
stable@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to