This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    watchdog: shwdt: fix usage of mod_timer

to the 3.0-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     watchdog-shwdt-fix-usage-of-mod_timer.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.0 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <sta...@kernel.org> know about it.


>From bea1906620ce72b63f83735c4cc2642b25ec54ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Engraf <david.eng...@sysgo.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:03:39 +0200
Subject: watchdog: shwdt: fix usage of mod_timer

From: David Engraf <david.eng...@sysgo.com>

commit bea1906620ce72b63f83735c4cc2642b25ec54ae upstream.

Fix the usage of mod_timer() and make the driver usable. mod_timer() must
be called with an absolute timeout in jiffies. The old implementation
used a relative timeout thus the hardware watchdog was never triggered.

Signed-off-by: David Engraf <david.eng...@sysgo.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <let...@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van sebroeck <w...@iguana.be>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@suse.de>

---
 drivers/watchdog/shwdt.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/watchdog/shwdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/shwdt.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
  * misses its deadline, the kernel timer will allow the WDT to overflow.
  */
 static int clock_division_ratio = WTCSR_CKS_4096;
-#define next_ping_period(cks)  msecs_to_jiffies(cks - 4)
+#define next_ping_period(cks)  (jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(cks - 4))
 
 static const struct watchdog_info sh_wdt_info;
 static struct platform_device *sh_wdt_dev;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from david.eng...@sysgo.com are

queue-3.0/watchdog-shwdt-fix-usage-of-mod_timer.patch

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
stable@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to