On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 02:42:08AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 12:14:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > @@ -87,38 +87,48 @@ sha512_transform(u64 *state, const u8 *i > > u64 a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, t1, t2; > > > > int i; > > - u64 W[80]; > > + u64 W[16]; > > This needs 3rd companion patch which does stack reduction even on i386. > Patch which removes excessive loop unrolling and thus fixes the problem > has been posted. Maybe there is some other way to maintain low stack > space on i386 but I haven't found it. > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=132768692525017&w=4 > > If you apply only 2, original bug will be fixed, but on at least i386 > stack usage could go in 900-byte region.
But this patch isn't in Linus's tree yet, right? So, should I just drop this one for now (well both of them) or just wait for the above referenced patch to hit Linus's tree and handle it then? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
