On 02/05/2012 11:53 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Thanks for this report, I missed this patch. I thought the reason for the lack of scsi_cmd_blk_ioctl() it was one of the differences between 2.6.27 and 2.6.32, so I have adapted the callers I identified to perform the same test as what's in scsi_cmd_blk_ioctl().
There were other callers in patch 1/3, most notably virtio-blk, that are not in your patch.
I*think* I did it correctly, but it would be safer
to apply the original patch, of course. Now I see the patch (618 in my queue). I'll merge it and it will simplify the backport.
Sounds like a plan, thanks! Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
