The patch titled
     Subject: afs: remote abort can cause BUG in rxrpc code
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     afs-remote-abort-can-cause-bug-in-rxrpc-code.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Anton Blanchard <[email protected]>
Subject: afs: remote abort can cause BUG in rxrpc code

When writing files to afs I sometimes hit a BUG:

kernel BUG at fs/afs/rxrpc.c:179!

With a backtrace of:

        afs_free_call
        afs_make_call
        afs_fs_store_data
        afs_vnode_store_data
        afs_write_back_from_locked_page
        afs_writepages_region
        afs_writepages

The cause is:

        ASSERT(skb_queue_empty(&call->rx_queue));

Looking at a tcpdump of the session the abort happens because we
are exceeding our disk quota:

        rx abort fs reply store-data error diskquota exceeded (32)

So the abort error is valid. We hit the BUG because we haven't
freed all the resources for the call.

By freeing any skbs in call->rx_queue before calling afs_free_call
we avoid hitting leaking memory and avoid hitting the BUG.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <[email protected]>
Cc: David Howells <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---

 fs/afs/rxrpc.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff -puN fs/afs/rxrpc.c~afs-remote-abort-can-cause-bug-in-rxrpc-code 
fs/afs/rxrpc.c
--- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c~afs-remote-abort-can-cause-bug-in-rxrpc-code
+++ a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
@@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ int afs_make_call(struct in_addr *addr, 
        struct msghdr msg;
        struct kvec iov[1];
        int ret;
+       struct sk_buff *skb;
 
        _enter("%x,{%d},", addr->s_addr, ntohs(call->port));
 
@@ -380,6 +381,8 @@ int afs_make_call(struct in_addr *addr, 
 
 error_do_abort:
        rxrpc_kernel_abort_call(rxcall, RX_USER_ABORT);
+       while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&call->rx_queue)))
+               afs_free_skb(skb);
        rxrpc_kernel_end_call(rxcall);
        call->rxcall = NULL;
 error_kill_call:
_
Subject: Subject: afs: remote abort can cause BUG in rxrpc code

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are

linux-next.patch
afs-read-of-file-returns-ebadmsg.patch
afs-remote-abort-can-cause-bug-in-rxrpc-code.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to