This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ppp: fix 'ppp_mp_reconstruct bad seq' errors
to the 3.0-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ppp-fix-ppp_mp_reconstruct-bad-seq-errors.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.0 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.
>From a52a55a6eca3a942c7126e1543ae5552225bc38d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben McKeegan <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:33:56 +0000
Subject: ppp: fix 'ppp_mp_reconstruct bad seq' errors
From: Ben McKeegan <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit 8a49ad6e89feb5015e77ce6efeb2678947117e20 ]
This patch fixes a (mostly cosmetic) bug introduced by the patch
'ppp: Use SKB queue abstraction interfaces in fragment processing'
found here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg153312.html
The above patch rewrote and moved the code responsible for cleaning
up discarded fragments but the new code does not catch every case
where this is necessary. This results in some discarded fragments
remaining in the queue, and triggering a 'bad seq' error on the
subsequent call to ppp_mp_reconstruct. Fragments are discarded
whenever other fragments of the same frame have been lost.
This can generate a lot of unwanted and misleading log messages.
This patch also adds additional detail to the debug logging to
make it clearer which fragments were lost and which other fragments
were discarded as a result of losses. (Run pppd with 'kdebug 1'
option to enable debug logging.)
Signed-off-by: Ben McKeegan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ppp_generic.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/net/ppp_generic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp_generic.c
@@ -2019,14 +2019,22 @@ ppp_mp_reconstruct(struct ppp *ppp)
continue;
}
if (PPP_MP_CB(p)->sequence != seq) {
+ u32 oldseq;
/* Fragment `seq' is missing. If it is after
minseq, it might arrive later, so stop here. */
if (seq_after(seq, minseq))
break;
/* Fragment `seq' is lost, keep going. */
lost = 1;
+ oldseq = seq;
seq = seq_before(minseq, PPP_MP_CB(p)->sequence)?
minseq + 1: PPP_MP_CB(p)->sequence;
+
+ if (ppp->debug & 1)
+ netdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, ppp->dev,
+ "lost frag %u..%u\n",
+ oldseq, seq-1);
+
goto again;
}
@@ -2071,6 +2079,10 @@ ppp_mp_reconstruct(struct ppp *ppp)
struct sk_buff *tmp2;
skb_queue_reverse_walk_from_safe(list, p, tmp2) {
+ if (ppp->debug & 1)
+ netdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, ppp->dev,
+ "discarding frag %u\n",
+ PPP_MP_CB(p)->sequence);
__skb_unlink(p, list);
kfree_skb(p);
}
@@ -2086,6 +2098,17 @@ ppp_mp_reconstruct(struct ppp *ppp)
/* If we have discarded any fragments,
signal a receive error. */
if (PPP_MP_CB(head)->sequence != ppp->nextseq) {
+ skb_queue_walk_safe(list, p, tmp) {
+ if (p == head)
+ break;
+ if (ppp->debug & 1)
+ netdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, ppp->dev,
+ "discarding frag %u\n",
+ PPP_MP_CB(p)->sequence);
+ __skb_unlink(p, list);
+ kfree_skb(p);
+ }
+
if (ppp->debug & 1)
netdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, ppp->dev,
" missed pkts %u..%u\n",
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-3.0/ppp-fix-ppp_mp_reconstruct-bad-seq-errors.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
