On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:36:39AM +0200, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not 100% sure, but I think this one could go to 3.0.x as well, am I right? > If it's so, could I try to provide backport? (it't doesn't apply cleanly).
If you want to try a backport go right ahead. There is an indirect dependency on [2bcf8879: mm: take pagevecs off reclaim stack] which is not suitable for backporting to -stable but handling that should be easy. > Mel, would You care to review then? Or do You plan to send Your own backport? > I had not planned my own backport because the type of bug made it a low priority for me (copying NTFS with small block size on 32 bit X86 with 16G of RAM). If you backport it, I'll review the result. I will be at LSF/MM next week so I might be a bit slow to respond but I'll get around to it. Thanks. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
