3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> commit e59d27e05a6435f8c04d5ad843f37fa795f2eaaa upstream. Firstly, task->tk_status will always return negative error values, so the current tests for 'NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED' etc. are all being ignored. Secondly, clean up the code so that we only need to test task->tk_status once! Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -5983,21 +5983,22 @@ nfs4_layoutcommit_done(struct rpc_task * return; switch (task->tk_status) { /* Just ignore these failures */ - case NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED: /* layout was recalled */ - case NFS4ERR_BADIOMODE: /* no IOMODE_RW layout for range */ - case NFS4ERR_BADLAYOUT: /* no layout */ - case NFS4ERR_GRACE: /* loca_recalim always false */ + case -NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED: /* layout was recalled */ + case -NFS4ERR_BADIOMODE: /* no IOMODE_RW layout for range */ + case -NFS4ERR_BADLAYOUT: /* no layout */ + case -NFS4ERR_GRACE: /* loca_recalim always false */ task->tk_status = 0; - } - - if (nfs4_async_handle_error(task, server, NULL) == -EAGAIN) { - rpc_restart_call_prepare(task); - return; - } - - if (task->tk_status == 0) + break; + case 0: nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc(data->args.inode, data->res.fattr); + break; + default: + if (nfs4_async_handle_error(task, server, NULL) == -EAGAIN) { + rpc_restart_call_prepare(task); + return; + } + } } static void nfs4_layoutcommit_release(void *calldata) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
