The patch titled
     Subject: nohz: fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of /proc/stat
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     nohz-fix-idle-ticks-in-cpu-summary-line-of-proc-stat.patch

This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
From: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Subject: nohz: fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of /proc/stat

Commit 09a1d34f8535ecf9 ("nohz: Make idle/iowait counter update
conditional") introduced a bug in regard to cpu hotplug.  The effect is
that the number of idle ticks in the cpu summary line in /proc/stat is
still counting ticks for offline cpus.

Reproduction is easy, just start a workload that keeps all cpus busy,
switch off one or more cpus and then watch the idle field in top.  On a
dual-core with one cpu 100% busy and one offline cpu you will get
something like this:

%Cpu(s): 48.7 us,  1.3 sy,  0.0 ni, 50.0 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st

The problem is that an offline cpu still has ts->idle_active == 1.  To fix
this we should make sure that the cpu is online when calling
get_cpu_idle_time_us and get_cpu_iowait_time_us.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>    [3.2.x]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---

 fs/proc/stat.c |   14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/proc/stat.c~nohz-fix-idle-ticks-in-cpu-summary-line-of-proc-stat 
fs/proc/stat.c
--- a/fs/proc/stat.c~nohz-fix-idle-ticks-in-cpu-summary-line-of-proc-stat
+++ a/fs/proc/stat.c
@@ -24,10 +24,13 @@
 
 static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu)
 {
-       u64 idle, idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
+       u64 idle, idle_time = -1ULL;
+
+       if (cpu_online(cpu))
+               idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
 
        if (idle_time == -1ULL) {
-               /* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.idle */
+               /* !NO_HZ or cpu offline so we can rely on cpustat.idle */
                idle = kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[CPUTIME_IDLE];
                idle += arch_idle_time(cpu);
        } else
@@ -38,10 +41,13 @@ static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu)
 
 static u64 get_iowait_time(int cpu)
 {
-       u64 iowait, iowait_time = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL);
+       u64 iowait, iowait_time = -1ULL;
+
+       if (cpu_online(cpu))
+               iowait_time = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL);
 
        if (iowait_time == -1ULL)
-               /* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */
+               /* !NO_HZ or cpu offline so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */
                iowait = kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[CPUTIME_IOWAIT];
        else
                iowait = usecs_to_cputime64(iowait_time);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are

origin.patch
memcg-fix-change-behavior-of-shared-anon-at-moving-task.patch
memcg-swap-mem_cgroup_move_swap_account-never-needs-fixup.patch
memcg-swap-use-mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap.patch
mm-memcg-scanning_global_lru-means-mem_cgroup_disabled.patch
mm-memcg-move-reclaim_stat-into-lruvec.patch
mm-push-lru-index-into-shrink_active_list.patch
mm-push-lru-index-into-shrink_active_list-fix.patch
mm-mark-mm-inline-functions-as-__always_inline.patch
mm-remove-lru-type-checks-from-__isolate_lru_page.patch
mm-memcg-kill-mem_cgroup_lru_del.patch
mm-memcg-use-vm_swappiness-from-target-memory-cgroup.patch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to