On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 11:36:23AM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 02:49:37PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Commit 360f748b204275229f8398cb2f9f53955db1503b > >> > "serial: PL011: clear pending interrupts" > >> > attempts to clear interrupts by writing to a > >> > yet-unassigned memory address. This fixes the issue. > >> > > >> > The breaking patch is marked for stable so should be > >> > carried along with the other patch. > >> > > >> > Cc: Shreshtha Kumar Sahu <[email protected]> > >> > Cc: Russell King <[email protected]> > >> > Cc: stable <[email protected]> > >> > Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > >> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > >> > >> Ugh; the original patch is obviously broken. How did it get applied > >> without testing? > >> > >> Greg, can you get this out to Linus ASAP please? I have one comment > >> below, but I don't think it should block merging this patch. > >> > >> Tested-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]> > > > > Thanks, I'll get it to him after 3.4-rc1 is out, in a few days, along > > with other tty fixes being queued up. > > Hi Greg, > > Just wanted to check this didn't fall through the cracks, as I don't > see it in your tty-next or tty-linus branches. > > The original bad commit causes Silent Boot Death on qemu ARM > versatile, which is kind of nasty. It pretty much forces a bisection, > which I did, which then led me here.
It's still in my "to-apply" queue, don't worry, it's not lost. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
