Just one minor correction in this looney email thread: On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 01:53:22AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > v3.3.x on the other hand are *not* stable. They contain patches > backported from v3.4, but nobody guarantees they will work. There was > no v3.3.1-rc1, so the first time the patches compromising v3.3.1 were > generally tested together is in v3.3.1, at which point if somebody > finds issues, it's too late; bad patches are *not* going to be removed > in v3.3.2.
Of course there was a 3.3.1-rc1, see the linux-kernel archives for the announcemen and the individual patches. kernel.org has the large patch itself if you like that format instead. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
