3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> commit 55725513b5ef9d462aa3e18527658a0362aaae83 upstream. Since we may be simulating flock() locks using NFS byte range locks, we can't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode for us. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index 3c787d0..ba837d9 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -4726,6 +4726,20 @@ nfs4_proc_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *request) if (state == NULL) return -ENOLCK; + /* + * Don't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode, + * since it won't do this for flock() locks. + */ + switch (request->fl_type & (F_RDLCK|F_WRLCK|F_UNLCK)) { + case F_RDLCK: + if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ)) + return -EBADF; + break; + case F_WRLCK: + if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)) + return -EBADF; + } + do { status = nfs4_proc_setlk(state, cmd, request); if ((status != -EAGAIN) || IS_SETLK(cmd)) -- 1.7.10 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
