The patch below does not apply to the 3.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From a5fdde28b4f5fb756032e7ad2c6fcdcffde20958 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:36:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] iwlwifi: fix TX power antenna access Since my commit iwlwifi: use valid TX/RX antenna from hw_params the config values are pure overrides, not the real values for all hardware. Therefore, the EEPROM TX power reading code checks the wrong values, it should check the hw_params values. Cc: [email protected] [3.4] Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom.c index 50c5891..b8e2b22 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom.c @@ -568,28 +568,28 @@ static int iwl_find_otp_image(struct iwl_trans *trans, * iwl_get_max_txpower_avg - get the highest tx power from all chains. * find the highest tx power from all chains for the channel */ -static s8 iwl_get_max_txpower_avg(const struct iwl_cfg *cfg, +static s8 iwl_get_max_txpower_avg(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_eeprom_enhanced_txpwr *enhanced_txpower, int element, s8 *max_txpower_in_half_dbm) { s8 max_txpower_avg = 0; /* (dBm) */ /* Take the highest tx power from any valid chains */ - if ((cfg->valid_tx_ant & ANT_A) && + if ((priv->hw_params.valid_tx_ant & ANT_A) && (enhanced_txpower[element].chain_a_max > max_txpower_avg)) max_txpower_avg = enhanced_txpower[element].chain_a_max; - if ((cfg->valid_tx_ant & ANT_B) && + if ((priv->hw_params.valid_tx_ant & ANT_B) && (enhanced_txpower[element].chain_b_max > max_txpower_avg)) max_txpower_avg = enhanced_txpower[element].chain_b_max; - if ((cfg->valid_tx_ant & ANT_C) && + if ((priv->hw_params.valid_tx_ant & ANT_C) && (enhanced_txpower[element].chain_c_max > max_txpower_avg)) max_txpower_avg = enhanced_txpower[element].chain_c_max; - if (((cfg->valid_tx_ant == ANT_AB) | - (cfg->valid_tx_ant == ANT_BC) | - (cfg->valid_tx_ant == ANT_AC)) && + if (((priv->hw_params.valid_tx_ant == ANT_AB) | + (priv->hw_params.valid_tx_ant == ANT_BC) | + (priv->hw_params.valid_tx_ant == ANT_AC)) && (enhanced_txpower[element].mimo2_max > max_txpower_avg)) max_txpower_avg = enhanced_txpower[element].mimo2_max; - if ((cfg->valid_tx_ant == ANT_ABC) && + if ((priv->hw_params.valid_tx_ant == ANT_ABC) && (enhanced_txpower[element].mimo3_max > max_txpower_avg)) max_txpower_avg = enhanced_txpower[element].mimo3_max; @@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ static void iwl_eeprom_enhanced_txpower(struct iwl_priv *priv) ((txp->delta_20_in_40 & 0xf0) >> 4), (txp->delta_20_in_40 & 0x0f)); - max_txp_avg = iwl_get_max_txpower_avg(priv->cfg, txp_array, idx, + max_txp_avg = iwl_get_max_txpower_avg(priv, txp_array, idx, &max_txp_avg_halfdbm); /* -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
