This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    powerpc/pseries: Honor the generic "no_64bit_msi" flag

to the 3.17-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     powerpc-pseries-honor-the-generic-no_64bit_msi-flag.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.17 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.


>From 415072a041bf50dbd6d56934ffc0cbbe14c97be8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 16:12:55 +1100
Subject: powerpc/pseries: Honor the generic "no_64bit_msi" flag

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>

commit 415072a041bf50dbd6d56934ffc0cbbe14c97be8 upstream.

Instead of the arch specific quirk which we are deprecating

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static int rtas_setup_msi_irqs(struct pc
         */
 again:
        if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI) {
-               if (pdn->force_32bit_msi) {
+               if (pdev->no_64bit_msi) {
                        rc = rtas_change_msi(pdn, RTAS_CHANGE_32MSI_FN, nvec);
                        if (rc < 0) {
                                /*


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] 
are

queue-3.17/of-base-fix-powerpc-address-parsing-hack.patch
queue-3.17/powerpc-pseries-honor-the-generic-no_64bit_msi-flag.patch
queue-3.17/pci-msi-add-device-flag-indicating-that-64-bit-msis-don-t-work.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to