Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 23:02 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>> From: Chris Boot <[email protected]> >> >> commit id 59aed95263bdd0e2b48eb9be5a94346d2d4abf90 >> Backport to 3.2-3.4 kernels >> >> For the 82573, ASPM L1 gets disabled wholesale so this special-case code >> is not required. For the 82574 the previous patch does the same as for >> the 82573, disabling L1 on the adapter. Thus, this code is no longer >> required and can be removed. > [...] > > Both added to the queue, thanks. Both patches look good and the first one looks important, but why the second one? I ask because each unnecessary patch that is rejected for stable@ makes it more likely that people will have time to look over the accepted ones. Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
