On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Kevin Hilman <[email protected]> wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f >>> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some >>> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one. >>> >>> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver. >>> >>> Cc: <[email protected]> # 3.18 >>> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]> >>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> >> >> OK, so who should be applying this? >> > > Normally, we take these defconfig changes through the arm-soc tree, and > I think that should continue, otherwise we'll be bound to have conflicts. > > Note all the pull requests for this merge window are already sent, but > I'll queue this up in arm-soc/fixes so it can make it during the > v3.19-rc cycle.
Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we wait to go through Tony? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
