This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm/i915: Correct the IOSF Dev_FN field for IOSF transfers
to the 3.19-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
drm-i915-correct-the-iosf-dev_fn-field-for-iosf-transfers.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.19 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.
>From d180d2bbb66579e3bf449642b8ec2a76f4014fcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shobhit Kumar <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:10:56 +0530
Subject: drm/i915: Correct the IOSF Dev_FN field for IOSF transfers
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Shobhit Kumar <[email protected]>
commit d180d2bbb66579e3bf449642b8ec2a76f4014fcd upstream.
As per the specififcation, the SB_DevFn is the PCI_DEVFN of the target
device and not the source. So PCI_DEVFN(2,0) is not correct. Further the
port ID should be enough to identify devices unless they are MFD. The
SB_DevFn was intended to remove ambiguity in case of these MFD devices.
For non MFD devices the recommendation for the target device IP was to
ignore these fields, but not all of them followed the recommendation.
Some like CCK ignore these fields and hence PCI_DEVFN(2, 0) works and so
does PCI_DEVFN(0, 0) as it works for DPIO. The issue came to light because
of GPIONC which was not getting programmed correctly with PCI_DEVFN(2, 0).
It turned out that this did not follow the recommendation and expected 0
in this field.
In general the recommendation is to use SB_DevFn as PCI_DEVFN(0, 0) for
all devices except target PCI devices.
Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ u32 vlv_punit_read(struct drm_i915_priva
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock));
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_PUNIT,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_PUNIT,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, addr, &val);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void vlv_punit_write(struct drm_i915_pri
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock));
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_PUNIT,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_PUNIT,
SB_CRWRDA_NP, addr, &val);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
}
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ u32 vlv_bunit_read(struct drm_i915_priva
{
u32 val = 0;
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_BUNIT,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_BUNIT,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, reg, &val);
return val;
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ u32 vlv_bunit_read(struct drm_i915_priva
void vlv_bunit_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u32 val)
{
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_BUNIT,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_BUNIT,
SB_CRWRDA_NP, reg, &val);
}
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ u32 vlv_nc_read(struct drm_i915_private
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock));
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_NC,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_NC,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, addr, &val);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
@@ -132,56 +132,56 @@ u32 vlv_nc_read(struct drm_i915_private
u32 vlv_gpio_nc_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
{
u32 val = 0;
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPIO_NC,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPIO_NC,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, reg, &val);
return val;
}
void vlv_gpio_nc_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u32 val)
{
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPIO_NC,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPIO_NC,
SB_CRWRDA_NP, reg, &val);
}
u32 vlv_cck_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
{
u32 val = 0;
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCK,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCK,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, reg, &val);
return val;
}
void vlv_cck_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u32 val)
{
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCK,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCK,
SB_CRWRDA_NP, reg, &val);
}
u32 vlv_ccu_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
{
u32 val = 0;
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCU,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCU,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, reg, &val);
return val;
}
void vlv_ccu_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u32 val)
{
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCU,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_CCU,
SB_CRWRDA_NP, reg, &val);
}
u32 vlv_gps_core_read(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
{
u32 val = 0;
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPS_CORE,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPS_CORE,
SB_CRRDDA_NP, reg, &val);
return val;
}
void vlv_gps_core_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u32 val)
{
- vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(2, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPS_CORE,
+ vlv_sideband_rw(dev_priv, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0), IOSF_PORT_GPS_CORE,
SB_CRWRDA_NP, reg, &val);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected]
are
queue-3.19/drm-i915-correct-the-iosf-dev_fn-field-for-iosf-transfers.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
