This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ALSA: usb-audio: don't try to get Outlaw RR2150 sample rate

to the 4.0-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     alsa-usb-audio-don-t-try-to-get-outlaw-rr2150-sample-rate.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.0 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.


>From 2f80b2958abe5658000d5ad9b45a36ecf879666e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Wong <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 09:15:39 +0000
Subject: ALSA: usb-audio: don't try to get Outlaw RR2150 sample rate

From: Eric Wong <[email protected]>

commit 2f80b2958abe5658000d5ad9b45a36ecf879666e upstream.

This quirk allows us to avoid the noisy:

        current rate 0 is different from the runtime rate

message every time playback starts.  While USB DAC in the RR2150
supports reading the sample rate, it never returns a sample rate
other than zero in my observation with common sample rates.

Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Turner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 sound/usb/quirks.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/sound/usb/quirks.c
+++ b/sound/usb/quirks.c
@@ -1120,6 +1120,7 @@ bool snd_usb_get_sample_rate_quirk(struc
        case USB_ID(0x045E, 0x0772): /* MS Lifecam Studio */
        case USB_ID(0x045E, 0x0779): /* MS Lifecam HD-3000 */
        case USB_ID(0x04D8, 0xFEEA): /* Benchmark DAC1 Pre */
+       case USB_ID(0x074D, 0x3553): /* Outlaw RR2150 (Micronas UAC3553B) */
                return true;
        }
        return false;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.0/alsa-usb-audio-don-t-try-to-get-outlaw-rr2150-sample-rate.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in

Reply via email to