Il 25/07/2012 14:47, Boaz Harrosh ha scritto: > > NACK-by: Boaz Harrosh > > > Apart from the HighMem pages problem, where in previous sg_set_buf() > code was the marker copied? It was not because it is not needed because > the allocation of sg took care of that. For example in 64bit the is no > bugs, right? > > If there was a destination sg_list termination bug, it should be fixed > as a separate patch from this "HighMem pages problem". But I bet if > you inspect the code carefully there isn't such a bug.
Hmm, we're talking past each other. Let's sort it out in the v1 thread. Sen, please hold up the patch for a moment. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
