The patch titled
Subject: fsnotify: fix oops in fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags()
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
fsnotify-fix-oops-in-fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fsnotify-fix-oops-in-fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/fsnotify-fix-oops-in-fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Subject: fsnotify: fix oops in fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags()
fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can race with
fsnotify_destroy_marks() so when fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked() drops
mark_mutex, a mark from the list iterated by
fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can be freed and thus the next entry
pointer we have cached may become stale and we dereference free memory.
Fix the problem by first moving marks to free to a special private list
and then always free the first entry in the special list. This method is
safe even when entries from the list can disappear once we drop the lock.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Ashish Sangwan <[email protected]>
Cc: Lino Sanfilippo <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---
fs/notify/mark.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff -puN
fs/notify/mark.c~fsnotify-fix-oops-in-fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags
fs/notify/mark.c
--- a/fs/notify/mark.c~fsnotify-fix-oops-in-fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags
+++ a/fs/notify/mark.c
@@ -412,16 +412,36 @@ void fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags
unsigned int flags)
{
struct fsnotify_mark *lmark, *mark;
+ LIST_HEAD(to_free);
+ /*
+ * We have to be really careful here. Anytime we drop mark_mutex, e.g.
+ * fsnotify_clear_marks_by_inode() can come and free marks. Even in our
+ * to_free list so we have to use mark_mutex even when accessing that
+ * list. And freeing mark requires us to drop mark_mutex. So we can
+ * reliably free only the first mark in the list. That's why we first
+ * move marks to free to to_free list in one go and then free marks in
+ * to_free list one by one.
+ */
mutex_lock_nested(&group->mark_mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
list_for_each_entry_safe(mark, lmark, &group->marks_list, g_list) {
- if (mark->flags & flags) {
- fsnotify_get_mark(mark);
- fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked(mark, group);
- fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
- }
+ if (mark->flags & flags)
+ list_move(&mark->g_list, &to_free);
}
mutex_unlock(&group->mark_mutex);
+
+ while (1) {
+ mutex_lock_nested(&group->mark_mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+ if (list_empty(&to_free)) {
+ mutex_unlock(&group->mark_mutex);
+ break;
+ }
+ mark = list_first_entry(&to_free, struct fsnotify_mark, g_list);
+ fsnotify_get_mark(mark);
+ fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked(mark, group);
+ mutex_unlock(&group->mark_mutex);
+ fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
+ }
}
/*
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are
origin.patch
fsnotify-fix-oops-in-fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags.patch
fs-optimize-inotify-fsnotify-code-for-unwatched-files.patch
linux-next.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
