4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Xi Wang <xi.w...@gmail.com>
commit 8eee539ddea09bccae2426f09b0ba6a18b72b691 upstream.
Problems occur when bpf_to or bpf_from has value prog->len - 1 (e.g.,
"Very long jump backwards" in test_bpf where the last instruction is a
jump): since ctx->offset has length prog->len, ctx->offset[bpf_to + 1]
or ctx->offset[bpf_from + 1] will cause an out-of-bounds read, leading
to a bogus jump offset and kernel panic.
This patch moves updating ctx->offset to after calling build_insn(),
and changes indexing to use bpf_to and bpf_from without + 1.
Fixes: e54bcde3d69d ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler")
Cc: Zi Shen Lim <zlim....@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.w...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -113,9 +113,9 @@ static inline void emit_a64_mov_i(const
static inline int bpf2a64_offset(int bpf_to, int bpf_from,
const struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
- int to = ctx->offset[bpf_to + 1];
+ int to = ctx->offset[bpf_to];
/* -1 to account for the Branch instruction */
- int from = ctx->offset[bpf_from + 1] - 1;
+ int from = ctx->offset[bpf_from] - 1;
return to - from;
}
@@ -640,10 +640,11 @@ static int build_body(struct jit_ctx *ct
const struct bpf_insn *insn = &prog->insnsi[i];
int ret;
+ ret = build_insn(insn, ctx);
+
if (ctx->image == NULL)
ctx->offset[i] = ctx->idx;
- ret = build_insn(insn, ctx);
if (ret > 0) {
i++;
continue;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
