On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:06:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:55:57PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > As we mark the preallocated objects as bound, we should also flag them
> > correctly as being map-and-fenceable (if appropriate!) so that latter
> > users do not get confused and try and rebind the pinned vma in order to
> > get a map-and-fenceable binding.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "Goel, Akash" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> 
> Jani, can you please pick up both? And some bugzilla references for either
> would be great too - Chris?
> 
> Oh and does patch 1 fix the execlist resume troubles? Execlist having
> bigger contexts might be enough explanations for the apparent regression.
> 
> And can we igt patch 1 somehow? E.g. with memory pressure plus doing an
> mmap on the legacy fbdev ...

Actually add Jani ...
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to