3.19.8-ckt6 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>

commit 963ad94853000ab100f5ff19eea80095660d41b4 upstream.

Since slave_changelink support was added there have been a few race
conditions when using br_setport() since some of the port functions it
uses require the bridge lock. It is very easy to trigger a lockup due to
some internal spin_lock() usage without bh disabled, also it's possible to
get the bridge into an inconsistent state.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>
Fixes: 3ac636b8591c ("bridge: implement rtnl_link_ops->slave_changelink")
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
---
 net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
index 9f5eb55..36e56a9 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
@@ -466,9 +466,17 @@ static int br_port_slave_changelink(struct net_device 
*brdev,
                                    struct nlattr *tb[],
                                    struct nlattr *data[])
 {
+       struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(brdev);
+       int ret;
+
        if (!data)
                return 0;
-       return br_setport(br_port_get_rtnl(dev), data);
+
+       spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
+       ret = br_setport(br_port_get_rtnl(dev), data);
+       spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
+
+       return ret;
 }
 
 static int br_port_fill_slave_info(struct sk_buff *skb,
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to