On Tue, 08 Sep 2015, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> In I915_READ64_2x32 we attempt to read a 64bit register using 2 32bit
> reads. Due to the nature of the registers we try to read in this manner,
> they may increment between the two instruction (e.g. a timestamp
> counter). To keep the result accurate, we repeat the read if we detect
> an overflow (i.e. the upper value varies). However, some harware is just
> plain flaky and may endless loop as the the upper 32bits are not stable.
> Just give up after a couple of tries and report whatever we read last.
>
> Reported-by: [email protected]
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91906
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Cc: MichaƂ Winiarski <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 12870073d58f..8943dcb724a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -3402,13 +3402,13 @@ int intel_freq_opcode(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv, int val);
>  #define I915_READ64(reg)     dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readq(dev_priv, 
> (reg), true)
>  
>  #define I915_READ64_2x32(lower_reg, upper_reg) ({                    \
> -     u32 upper, lower, tmp;                                          \
> +     u32 upper, lower, tmp, loop = 0;                                \
>       tmp = I915_READ(upper_reg);                                     \
>       do {                                                            \
>               upper = tmp;                                            \
>               lower = I915_READ(lower_reg);                           \
>               tmp = I915_READ(upper_reg);                             \
> -     } while (upper != tmp);                                         \
> +     } while (upper != tmp && loop++ != 2);                          \

Do you think it matters that you'll take the previous, not the last,
value when you give up?

BR,
Jani.

>       (u64)upper << 32 | lower; })
>  
>  #define POSTING_READ(reg)    (void)I915_READ_NOTRACE(reg)
> -- 
> 2.5.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to