This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    spi: img-spfi: fix kbuild test robot warning

to the 4.2-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     spi-img-spfi-fix-kbuild-test-robot-warning.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.2 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.


>From 9176c6657b5c313cf504d157e6d91496ee5c8708 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sifan Naeem <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:33:01 +0100
Subject: spi: img-spfi: fix kbuild test robot warning

From: Sifan Naeem <[email protected]>

commit 9176c6657b5c313cf504d157e6d91496ee5c8708 upstream.

drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c: In function 'img_spfi_setup':
drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c:446: warning: 'ret' may be used
uninitialized in this function.

Fixes: commit b03ba9e314c1 ("spi: img-spfi: fix multiple calls to request gpio")
Signed-off-by: Sifan Naeem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int img_spfi_unprepare(struct spi
 
 static int img_spfi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
 {
-       int ret;
+       int ret = -EINVAL;
        struct img_spfi_device_data *spfi_data = spi_get_ctldata(spi);
 
        if (!spfi_data) {


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.2/spi-img-spfi-check-for-timeout-error-before-proceeding.patch
queue-4.2/spi-img-spfi-fix-multiple-calls-to-request-gpio.patch
queue-4.2/spi-img-spfi-fix-kbuild-test-robot-warning.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to