Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:12:28AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Timo Aaltonen wrote:

>>> Daniel Vetter (2):
>>>   drm/i915: outstanding_lazy_request is a u32
>>>   drm/i915: fixup seqno allocation logic for lazy_request
>>
>> The first of these two seems to be a no-op and odesn't seem to overlap
>> with the context for the second.  Does it fix a build error, oops,
>> hang, data corruption, real security issue, or other "oh, that's not
>> good" issue?
>
> Somehow I've thought we need that one, but on 2nd look it's just
> comestics, i.e. you can drop it.

Nice to hear.  Thanks for looking them over.

Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to