Assume a filesystem with 4KB blocks. When a file has size 1000 bytes and
we issue direct IO read at offset 1024, blockdev_direct_IO() reads the
tail of the last block and the logic for handling short DIO reads in
dio_complete() results in a return value -24 (1000 - 1024) which
obviously confuses userspace.

Fix the problem by bailing out early once we sample i_size and can
reliably check that direct IO read starts beyond i_size.

Reported-by: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
Fixes: 9fe55eea7e4b444bafc42fa0000cc2d1d2847275
CC: [email protected]
CC: Steven Whitehouse <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
---
 fs/direct-io.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Avi, this patch fixes the issue for me.

                                                                Honza

diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
index 18e7554cf94c..08094c9d8172 100644
--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -1163,6 +1163,15 @@ do_blockdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode 
*inode,
                }
        }
 
+       /* Once we sampled i_size check for reads beyond EOF */
+       dio->i_size = i_size_read(inode);
+       if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ && offset >= dio->i_size) {
+               if (dio->flags & DIO_LOCKING)
+                       mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
+               kmem_cache_free(dio_cache, dio);
+               goto out;
+       }
+
        /*
         * For file extending writes updating i_size before data writeouts
         * complete can expose uninitialized blocks in dumb filesystems.
@@ -1216,7 +1225,6 @@ do_blockdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode 
*inode,
        sdio.next_block_for_io = -1;
 
        dio->iocb = iocb;
-       dio->i_size = i_size_read(inode);
 
        spin_lock_init(&dio->bio_lock);
        dio->refcount = 1;
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to