When unwinding through IRQs and exceptions, the unwinding only continues
if the PC is a kernel text address, however since EVA it is possible for
user and kernel address ranges to overlap, potentially allowing
unwinding to continue to user mode if the user PC happens to be in the
kernel text address range.

Adjust the check to also ensure that the register state from before the
exception is actually running in kernel mode, i.e. !user_mode(regs).

I don't believe any harm can come of this problem, since the PC is only
output, the stack pointer is checked to ensure it resides within the
task's stack page before it is dereferenced in search of the return
address, and the return address register is similarly only output (if
the PC is in a leaf function or the beginning of a non-leaf function).

However unwind_stack() is only meant for unwinding kernel code, so to be
correct the unwind should stop there.

Signed-off-by: James Hogan <[email protected]>
Cc: Leonid Yegoshin <[email protected]>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: <[email protected]> # 3.15+
---
 arch/mips/kernel/process.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/process.c b/arch/mips/kernel/process.c
index f2975d4d1e44..6b3ae73cda3f 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/process.c
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ unsigned long notrace unwind_stack_by_address(unsigned long 
stack_page,
                    *sp + sizeof(*regs) <= stack_page + THREAD_SIZE - 32) {
                        regs = (struct pt_regs *)*sp;
                        pc = regs->cp0_epc;
-                       if (__kernel_text_address(pc)) {
+                       if (!user_mode(regs) && __kernel_text_address(pc)) {
                                *sp = regs->regs[29];
                                *ra = regs->regs[31];
                                return pc;
-- 
2.4.10

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to