These can wait for 4.4.

Thanks,
Matt


> On Dec 6, 2015, at 11:37 PM, <[email protected]> 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> The patch below does not apply to the 4.3-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <[email protected]>.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> 
> From 127a457acb2131fdb31c68c98cf11eda8ba7b380 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Matt Gingell <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:32:05 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix interrupt window handling in split IRQ chip
> case
> 
> This patch ensures that dm_request_for_irq_injection and
> post_kvm_run_save are in sync, avoiding that an endless ping-pong
> between userspace (who correctly notices that IF=0) and
> the kernel (who insists that userspace handles its request
> for the interrupt window).
> 
> To synchronize them, it also adds checks for kvm_arch_interrupt_allowed
> and !kvm_event_needs_reinjection.  These are always needed, not
> just for in-kernel LAPIC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Gingell <[email protected]>
> [A collage of two patches from Matt. - Paolo]
> Fixes: 1c1a9ce973a7863dd46767226bce2a5f12d48bc6
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 00462bd63129..46ed8edad793 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -2763,6 +2763,12 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_lapic(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu,
>       return 0;
> }
> 
> +static int kvm_cpu_accept_dm_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +     return (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu) ||
> +             kvm_apic_accept_pic_intr(vcpu));
> +}
> +
> static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>                                   struct kvm_interrupt *irq)
> {
> @@ -5921,12 +5927,16 @@ static int dm_request_for_irq_injection(struct 
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>       if (!vcpu->run->request_interrupt_window || pic_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))
>               return false;
> 
> +     if (!kvm_arch_interrupt_allowed(vcpu))
> +             return false;
> +
>       if (kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu))
>               return false;
> 
> -     return (irqchip_split(vcpu->kvm)
> -             ? kvm_apic_accept_pic_intr(vcpu)
> -             : kvm_arch_interrupt_allowed(vcpu));
> +     if (kvm_event_needs_reinjection(vcpu))
> +             return false;
> +
> +     return kvm_cpu_accept_dm_intr(vcpu);
> }
> 
> static void post_kvm_run_save(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -5937,17 +5947,12 @@ static void post_kvm_run_save(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>       kvm_run->flags = is_smm(vcpu) ? KVM_RUN_X86_SMM : 0;
>       kvm_run->cr8 = kvm_get_cr8(vcpu);
>       kvm_run->apic_base = kvm_get_apic_base(vcpu);
> -     if (!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))
> -             kvm_run->ready_for_interrupt_injection =
> -                     kvm_arch_interrupt_allowed(vcpu) &&
> -                     !kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu) &&
> -                     !kvm_event_needs_reinjection(vcpu);
> -     else if (!pic_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))
> -             kvm_run->ready_for_interrupt_injection =
> -                     kvm_apic_accept_pic_intr(vcpu) &&
> -                     !kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu);
> -     else
> -             kvm_run->ready_for_interrupt_injection = 1;
> +     kvm_run->ready_for_interrupt_injection =
> +             pic_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) ||
> +             (kvm_arch_interrupt_allowed(vcpu) &&
> +              !kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu) &&
> +              !kvm_event_needs_reinjection(vcpu) &&
> +              kvm_cpu_accept_dm_intr(vcpu));
> }
> 
> static void update_cr8_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to