On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:58:30AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 11:02 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 11:05:48AM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 3.5-stable tree. > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > > id to <[email protected]>. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > This was expected and it is due to patches upstream that would be overkill > > to backport. This version should apply and as it is the original version > > of the patch it should still be ok with Hugh and Michal (cc'd just in case). > > > > The same patch should be usable for 3.4-stable. I did not get rejection > > mails > > but I would also suggest that this be merged to 3.0-stable and 3.2-stable > > (added Ben to cc). > [...] > > I backported this myself rather than rejecting it. I think you must not > have noticed my note at the bottom of the original long commit message > when I sent it out as part of 3.2.27-rc1.
You're right, I did miss this this and I was cc'd on it so there is no excuse. > My version (commit > 6f72a41f67bb23a6478a0277d97f563830d3f25d, attached) appears to retain > some unnecessary complexity and leaves dead code, but does look > equivalent to this. But I'll be happy to substitute your cleaner > backport. > Your patch does look equivalent so if you want to keep it as you have already released 3.2.27 that should be fine. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
