On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 06:23:04PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:52:24PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > > I've CC'd stable to see if they want to pick this up. > > That's not how stable works - and you'll probably receive a standard form > whinge from them about that. Please read up on the submission requirements > to the stable kernel trees.
Ah, thanks. usually, I just add the Cc: line for fixes I send to arm-soc. Since this patch affects more than just kirkwood/marvell, I didn't feel it was appropriate to pull it in through my tree. > > It does depend on having dtc built. A patch already exists to build > > dtc on demand, but I'm not sure if it has made it into mainline yet. > > It may be in Russell's queue. > > At the moment, the only stuff I have outstanding for -rc is: > > 36418c5 ARM: 7499/1: mm: Fix vmalloc overlap check for !HIGHMEM > df547e0 ARM: 7503/1: mm: only flush both pmd entries for classic MMU > ae3790b ARM: 7502/1: contextidr: avoid using bfi instruction during notifier > dbece45 ARM: 7501/1: decompressor: reset ttbcr for VMSA ARMv7 cores > d968d2b ARM: 7497/1: hw_breakpoint: allow single-byte watchpoints on all > address > bf88011 ARM: 7496/1: hw_breakpoint: don't rely on dfsr to show watchpoint > access > a849088 ARM: Fix ioremap() of address zero > > I have nothing queued for dtc building, and there's no sign of anything > new in the patch system. What I'm referring to is here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/28/257 I submitted a patch six months ago for the exact same thing and was informed that others already had a pending patch in your queue for it. However, I can't for the life of me locate the thread atm. I remember it because it was the first patch I did that needed to go into your queue instead of through arm-soc. Obviously, I did something horribly wrong. ;-) thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
