On 15/10/2012, Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is the version that's under review for 3.2.y: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/bwh/linux-3.2.y-queue.git;a=blob_plain;f=queue-3.2/drm-i915-mark-untiled-blt-commands-as-fenced-on-gen2-3.patch;h=4ec2d388af7168d7bd659453e62dafd0f6b5e02b;hb=b6e32828805b35efce711f75f95f360770157f32 > > You can test what is due to become 3.2.32 by taking 3.2.31 and applying > the patch in <[email protected]>, > archived at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1375450/raw
OK. I'll have time to do that tomorrow or the day after. > >> gem_set_tiling_vs_pwrite passes >> 13 other tests fail > [...] > > Do you mean that 13 tests regress? Or were some/all of those already > failing? I'm sorry, I didn't detail all the results (though they can be seen on the logs). None of those are regressions. - 12 of those failures are the same that we have without the patch. - gem_cs_tlb is the "new" failure if run after other tests have run. It passes if it is run alone. Daniel said this is not relevant. - gem_set_tiling_vs_blt now succeeds. This is what Daniel asked to check with this patch. So it seems to be OK. The output of the tests is the same with or without 15a13bbdffb0. On 15/10/2012, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote: > > c07496fa61f4c5cb2addd1c57f6b should fix this testcase regression I > hope. At least it fixed an intermediate regression with this testcase > for me on my i915G. The issue is with bit17 swizzling, which > c9c4b6f6c283 fixes, and which has been the reason behind image > corruptions when swapping graphics buffers in&out papered over > another, much older bug. I'll also test that when I try all the other queued patches. Regards, Luís Picciochi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
