From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:03:18 +0200
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:01:04PM -0400, David Miller wrote: >> From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> >> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:55:57 +0200 >> >> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 03:49:30PM -0400, David Miller wrote: >> >> >> >> How about checking if these changes are already in 3.0/3.2/etc. or not >> >> before asking such questions? >> > >> > Because I didn't find the patches in 3.0 and Ben said he backported them >> > from 3.6, I think these are two valid reasons to ask, no ? >> >> Well, the thing is, I personally don't consider them appropriate for >> 3.x.y -stable backports, and that's why I haven't submitted them. > > OK. Is is because the issue is less important there or because the fix are > more risky than the issues they fix (or any other reason) ? I have a different opinion about the risk/benefit ratio than Ben does. I do not think these cases are important enough to enough people to justify -stable inclusion at all. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
