On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 05:57:38PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> 
> Please queue up the following fixes for 3.0, 3.2, 3.4, and
> 3.6 -stable branches, respectively.

These mboxes are not all "sequential".  For example, the 3.4 set of
patches contained 5 patches:
  1 N   Oct 10 Al Viro         (  79) [PATCH 1/6] sparc64: fix ptrace 
interaction with force_successful_syscall_return()
  2 N   Oct 14 David S. Miller (  47) [PATCH 2/6] sparc64: Like x86 we should 
check current->mm during perf backtrace generation.
  3 N   Oct 16 David S. Miller (  45) [PATCH 4/6] sparc64: Fix bit twiddling in 
sparc_pmu_enable_event().
  4 N   Aug 01 Jiri Kosina     (  47) [PATCH 5/6] sparc64: do not clobber 
personality flags in sys_sparc64_personality()
  5 N   Aug 15 David S. Miller (  71) [PATCH 6/6] sparc64: Be less verbose 
during vmemmap population.

Yet the description says there is 6?

Same for the 3.6 mbox:
   1 N   Oct 10 Al Viro         (  79) [PATCH 1/4] sparc64: fix ptrace 
interaction with force_successful_syscall_return()
   2 N   Oct 14 David S. Miller (  47) [PATCH 2/4] sparc64: Like x86 we should 
check current->mm during perf backtrace generation.
   3 N   Oct 16 David S. Miller (  44) [PATCH 4/4] sparc64: Fix bit twiddling 
in sparc_pmu_enable_event().
Only 3 patches, yet the sequence says there is 4?

The 3.0 mbox also is confused:
   1 N   Oct 10 Al Viro         (  79) [PATCH 1/6] sparc64: fix ptrace 
interaction with force_successful_syscall_return()
   2 N   Oct 14 David S. Miller (  47) [PATCH 2/6] sparc64: Like x86 we should 
check current->mm during perf backtrace generation.
   3 N   Oct 16 David S. Miller (  45) [PATCH 4/6] sparc64: Fix bit twiddling 
in sparc_pmu_enable_event().
   4 N   Aug 01 Jiri Kosina     (  47) [PATCH 5/6] sparc64: do not clobber 
personality flags in sys_sparc64_personality()
   5 N   Aug 15 David S. Miller (  71) [PATCH 6/6] sparc64: Be less verbose 
during vmemmap population.

I didn't look at the 3.2 mbox.

Did I get something wrong here?  Should there really be a missing patch from
each of these?  Just want to verify before I apply anything.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to