commit: 3798f47aa276b332c30da499cb4df4577e2f8872
From: Sachin Prabhu <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 11:39:32 +0000
Subject: cifs: Do not lookup hashed negative dentry in cifs_atomic_open

We do not need to lookup a hashed negative directory since we have
already revalidated it before and have found it to be fine.

This also prevents a crash in cifs_lookup() when it attempts to rehash
the already hashed negative lookup dentry.

The patch has been tested using the reproducer at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867344#c28

Cc: <[email protected]> # 3.6.x
Reported-by: Vit Zahradka <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sachin Prabhu <[email protected]>
---
 fs/cifs/dir.c |   11 ++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/dir.c b/fs/cifs/dir.c
index 7c0a812..d3671f2 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/dir.c
@@ -398,7 +398,16 @@ cifs_atomic_open(struct inode *inode, struct dentry 
*direntry,
         * in network traffic in the other paths.
         */
        if (!(oflags & O_CREAT)) {
-               struct dentry *res = cifs_lookup(inode, direntry, 0);
+               struct dentry *res;
+
+               /*
+                * Check for hashed negative dentry. We have already revalidated
+                * the dentry and it is fine. No need to perform another lookup.
+                */
+               if (!d_unhashed(direntry))
+                       return -ENOENT;
+
+               res = cifs_lookup(inode, direntry, 0);
                if (IS_ERR(res))
                        return PTR_ERR(res);
 
-- 
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to