On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 16:42 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchi...@solarflare.com> > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 23:18:53 +0000 > > > On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 18:06 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> I believe this fix is still needed for 2.6.34.y, 2.6.35.y, 3.0.y and > >> 3.2.y: > >> > >> commit 115c9b81928360d769a76c632bae62d15206a94a > >> Author: Greg Rose <gregory.v.r...@intel.com> > >> Date: Tue Feb 21 16:54:48 2012 -0500 > >> > >> rtnetlink: Fix problem with buffer allocation > > > > Please ack or nak this. > > > > This follow-up would also be needed: > > > > commit a4b64fbe482c7766f7925f03067fc637716bfa3f > > Author: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> > > Date: Sun Mar 4 12:32:10 2012 +0000 > > > > rtnetlink: fix rtnl_calcit() and rtnl_dump_ifinfo() > > These look fine, ACK.
I've queued these up for 3.2. There was one hunk in 'rtnetlink: Fix problem with buffer allocation' which didn't apply, but it just reverts another post-3.2 change (commit f18da14565819ba43b8321237e2426a2914cc2ef) so can safely be dropped. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Design a system any fool can use, and only a fool will want to use it.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
