On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:23:21PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:58:46AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 03:44:11AM -0500, George Spelvin wrote:
> > > The following patch is marked "Cc: [email protected]",
> > > but I do not see it in any -stable release as of 3.6.6.
> > >
> > > Ted, Greg, can you two please figure out where it got dropped?
> >
> > Well, it was cc'ed to [email protected]. It may be because you
> > needed to apply the hunk you've identified, but I don't recall Greg
> > sending me a note saying this patch was dropped from consideration for
> > the stable series. On the other hand, between travel and my getting
> > distracted by the Phoronix-inspired hysteria, I may have missed
> > something....
> >
> > Greg, did I miss a patch rejected notice from you?
>
> Odd, no. I see it as one of the patches that I should have applied, but
> for some reason, never did. I must have accidentally got it mixed up
> with those other ext4 failures, my fault.
>
> This is now queued up, thanks for pointing it out.
Ah, I see what happened now, the patch fails to build in the 3.6 tree:
fs/ext4/resize.c: In function ‘update_backups’:
fs/ext4/resize.c:982:39: error: too many arguments to function
‘ext4_superblock_csum_set’
In file included from fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:20:0,
from fs/ext4/resize.c:17:
Which is why I dropped it. As it applied cleanly, I forgot to send you
the FAILURE notice, my fault.
So, if someone wants to backport it to 3.6 so that it _build_ properly,
I'd be glad to take it.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
