This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    net: fix a race in gro_cell_poll()

to the 3.7-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     net-fix-a-race-in-gro_cell_poll.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.7 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.


>From 168b60069f773eb662e26ad23e7e8e274ae8cbba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:32:03 +0000
Subject: net: fix a race in gro_cell_poll()


From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit f8e8f97c11d5ff3cc47d85b97c7c35e443dcf490 ]

Dmitry Kravkov reported packet drops for GRE packets since GRO support
was added.

There is a race in gro_cell_poll() because we call napi_complete()
without any synchronization with a concurrent gro_cells_receive()

Once bug was triggered, we queued packets but did not schedule NAPI
poll.

We can fix this issue using the spinlock protected the napi_skbs queue,
as we have to hold it to perform skb dequeue anyway.

As we open-code skb_dequeue(), we no longer need to mask IRQS, as both
producer and consumer run under BH context.

Bug added in commit c9e6bc644e (net: add gro_cells infrastructure)

Reported-by: Dmitry Kravkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Dmitry Kravkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 include/net/gro_cells.h |   14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/include/net/gro_cells.h
+++ b/include/net/gro_cells.h
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ struct gro_cells {
 
 static inline void gro_cells_receive(struct gro_cells *gcells, struct sk_buff 
*skb)
 {
-       unsigned long flags;
        struct gro_cell *cell = gcells->cells;
        struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
 
@@ -35,32 +34,37 @@ static inline void gro_cells_receive(str
                return;
        }
 
-       spin_lock_irqsave(&cell->napi_skbs.lock, flags);
+       /* We run in BH context */
+       spin_lock(&cell->napi_skbs.lock);
 
        __skb_queue_tail(&cell->napi_skbs, skb);
        if (skb_queue_len(&cell->napi_skbs) == 1)
                napi_schedule(&cell->napi);
 
-       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cell->napi_skbs.lock, flags);
+       spin_unlock(&cell->napi_skbs.lock);
 }
 
+/* called unser BH context */
 static inline int gro_cell_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 {
        struct gro_cell *cell = container_of(napi, struct gro_cell, napi);
        struct sk_buff *skb;
        int work_done = 0;
 
+       spin_lock(&cell->napi_skbs.lock);
        while (work_done < budget) {
-               skb = skb_dequeue(&cell->napi_skbs);
+               skb = __skb_dequeue(&cell->napi_skbs);
                if (!skb)
                        break;
-
+               spin_unlock(&cell->napi_skbs.lock);
                napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
                work_done++;
+               spin_lock(&cell->napi_skbs.lock);
        }
 
        if (work_done < budget)
                napi_complete(napi);
+       spin_unlock(&cell->napi_skbs.lock);
        return work_done;
 }
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-3.7/net-fix-a-race-in-gro_cell_poll.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to