From: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Subject: lib: atomic64: initialize locks statically to fix early users

The atomic64 library uses a handful of static spin locks to implement
atomic 64-bit operations on architectures without support for atomic
64-bit instructions.  Unfortunately, the spinlocks are initialized in a
pure initcall and that is too late for the vfs namespace code which wants
to use atomic64 operations before the initcall is run (introduced by
8823c07 "vfs: Add setns support for the mount namespace").

This leads to BUG messages such as:

BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/0/0
 lock: atomic64_lock+0x240/0x400, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, 
.owner_cpu: 0
[<c001af64>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c02c2010>] 
(do_raw_spin_lock+0x158/0x198)
[<c02c2010>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x158/0x198) from [<c04d89ec>] 
(_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58)
[<c04d89ec>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58) from [<c02cabf0>] 
(atomic64_add_return+0x30/0x5c)
[<c02cabf0>] (atomic64_add_return+0x30/0x5c) from [<c0124564>] 
(alloc_mnt_ns.clone.14+0x44/0xac)
[<c0124564>] (alloc_mnt_ns.clone.14+0x44/0xac) from [<c0124f4c>] 
(create_mnt_ns+0xc/0x54)
[<c0124f4c>] (create_mnt_ns+0xc/0x54) from [<c06f31a4>] (mnt_init+0x120/0x1d4)
[<c06f31a4>] (mnt_init+0x120/0x1d4) from [<c06f2d50>] 
(vfs_caches_init+0xe0/0x10c)
[<c06f2d50>] (vfs_caches_init+0xe0/0x10c) from [<c06d4798>] 
(start_kernel+0x29c/0x300)
[<c06d4798>] (start_kernel+0x29c/0x300) from [<80008078>] (0x80008078)

coming out early on during boot when spinlock debugging is enabled.

Fix this problem by initializing the spinlocks statically at compile time.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Vaibhav Bedia <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Vaibhav Bedia <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: David Miller <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---

 lib/atomic64.c |   17 +++++------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff -puN 
lib/atomic64.c~lib-atomic64-initialize-locks-statically-to-fix-early-users 
lib/atomic64.c
--- a/lib/atomic64.c~lib-atomic64-initialize-locks-statically-to-fix-early-users
+++ a/lib/atomic64.c
@@ -31,7 +31,11 @@
 static union {
        raw_spinlock_t lock;
        char pad[L1_CACHE_BYTES];
-} atomic64_lock[NR_LOCKS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+} atomic64_lock[NR_LOCKS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp = {
+       [0 ... (NR_LOCKS - 1)] = {
+               .lock =  __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(atomic64_lock.lock),
+       },
+};
 
 static inline raw_spinlock_t *lock_addr(const atomic64_t *v)
 {
@@ -173,14 +177,3 @@ int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, l
        return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(atomic64_add_unless);
-
-static int init_atomic64_lock(void)
-{
-       int i;
-
-       for (i = 0; i < NR_LOCKS; ++i)
-               raw_spin_lock_init(&atomic64_lock[i].lock);
-       return 0;
-}
-
-pure_initcall(init_atomic64_lock);
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to