On Wed 23-01-13 10:02:09, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jan Kara <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Running AIO is pinning inode in memory using file reference. Once AIO
> > is completed using aio_complete(), file reference is put and inode can
> > be freed from memory. So we have to be sure that calling aio_complete()
> > is the last thing we do with the inode.
> >
> > CC: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> > CC: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> > CC: Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>
> > CC: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  fs/direct-io.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
> > index cf5b44b..f853263 100644
> > --- a/fs/direct-io.c
> > +++ b/fs/direct-io.c
> > @@ -261,9 +261,9 @@ static ssize_t dio_complete(struct dio *dio, loff_t 
> > offset, ssize_t ret, bool is
> >             dio->end_io(dio->iocb, offset, transferred,
> >                         dio->private, ret, is_async);
> >     } else {
> > +           inode_dio_done(dio->inode);
> >             if (is_async)
> >                     aio_complete(dio->iocb, ret, 0);
> > -           inode_dio_done(dio->inode);
> >     }
> 
> OK, so this is only a problem if nobody is waiting in inode_dio_wait,
> yes?  Good catch, though it seems incredibly unlikely anyone would trip
> over this in practice (since fput is done in a worker thread, or
> deferred).
  Yes, it's mostly a theoretical race.

> Acked-by: Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>
  Thanks.

                                                                Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to