This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ASoC: arizona: Use actual rather than desired BCLK when calculating LRCLK

to the 3.7-stable tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     
asoc-arizona-use-actual-rather-than-desired-bclk-when-calculating-lrclk.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.7 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.


>From b59e0f82aa350e380142353fbd30706092ba6312 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:15:59 +0900
Subject: ASoC: arizona: Use actual rather than desired BCLK when calculating 
LRCLK

From: Mark Brown <[email protected]>

commit b59e0f82aa350e380142353fbd30706092ba6312 upstream.

Otherwise we'll get the wrong LRCLK if we need to pick a higher BCLK than
is required.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 sound/soc/codecs/arizona.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/sound/soc/codecs/arizona.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/arizona.c
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ static int arizona_hw_params(struct snd_
        }
        sr_val = i;
 
-       lrclk = snd_soc_params_to_bclk(params) / params_rate(params);
+       lrclk = rates[bclk] / params_rate(params);
 
        arizona_aif_dbg(dai, "BCLK %dHz LRCLK %dHz\n",
                        rates[bclk], rates[bclk] / lrclk);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from 
[email protected] are

queue-3.7/asoc-arizona-use-actual-rather-than-desired-bclk-when-calculating-lrclk.patch
queue-3.7/asoc-wm2200-correct-mixer-values-and-text.patch
queue-3.7/arm-s3c64xx-fix-up-irq-mapping-for-balblair-on-cragganmore.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to