On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 07:32 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 02:23:01 -0500 (EST)
> CAI Qian <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hello Peter and Jesse,
> > 
> > a9acc5365dbda29f7be2884efb63771dc24bd815
> > 
> > Should this be marked as stable? It is applied and built successfully
> > for 3.0.x, 3.4.x and 3.7.x. If needed, we have a couple of Sandy
> > Bridge with integrated graphics here can do some booting testing.
> > Just let me know!
> 
> Yeah, wouldn't hurt.  I'm checking on IVB too, a subset of this patch
> may be required there as well.

I've queued this up for 3.2, along with:

ab3cd8670e0b x86/Sandy Bridge: mark arrays in __init functions as __initconst
e43b3cec711a x86/Sandy Bridge: Sandy Bridge workaround depends on CONFIG_PCI

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
                                                           - Albert Einstein

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to