3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Romain Kuntz <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 85da53bf1c336bb07ac038fb951403ab0478d2c5 ]

The tests on the flags in addrconf_get_prefix_route() does no make
much sense: the 'noflags' parameter contains the set of flags that
must not match with the route flags, so the test must be done
against 'noflags', and not against 'flags'.

Signed-off-by: Romain Kuntz <[email protected]>
Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
---
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index aef80d7..b27baed 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ static struct rt6_info *addrconf_get_prefix_route(const 
struct in6_addr *pfx,
                        continue;
                if ((rt->rt6i_flags & flags) != flags)
                        continue;
-               if ((noflags != 0) && ((rt->rt6i_flags & flags) != 0))
+               if ((rt->rt6i_flags & noflags) != 0)
                        continue;
                dst_hold(&rt->dst);
                break;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to